A couple weeks ago, I had a friend ask me for some help. Honestly, I thought I would get these kinds of inquiries more often than I do as someone who is a full-time minister/pastor/professional Christian. She had a friend at work who knew a man who was in jail, and her friend was trying to find a good Bible study book written specifically for men that she could recommend. I should have been able to be more helpful, but literally the only two books I could think of were Wild at Heart and Every Man’s Battle. I mentioned those to her, but I also told her that I couldn’t highly recommend them. I’m sure there are people out there who have found those books immensely helpful, but I really struggle with that type of literature. Saying that men are a certain way, or that God created men to be like this or that, seems very limited to me.
At my small private Christian high school, we took Bible classes everyday all the way through. Juniors and Seniors got to choose what class they took. One of the football coaches taught a boys-only class called “Christian Men.” This class was going through 1 & 2 Samuel talking about the life of King David with some Psalms sprinkled in. And I thought that David perfectly exemplified what “manhood” was. David was this physically strong, courageous warrior on the battlefield who protected and led a nation. Here is the story that I remember best (for obvious reasons): David wanted to marry the daughter of King Saul, Michal, but King Saul wanted David out of the picture. So King Saul tells David that if he wants to marry Michal, he has to go to battle with a nation of people known as the Philistines, and not only win the battle, but then he has to bring back 100 Philistine’s penis foreskins. Yeah, this is in the Bible. King Saul thinks this will be the end of David. This is a suicide mission (later King David also sends a man to his death to get him out of the picture, but more on that later). David not only brings back the required amount of foreskins, but he doubles it and brings back 200. My football coach Bible teacher told us that they probably weren’t taking their time and making sure they were just getting the foreskin. They were probably just chopping away at the penises. Likely David dropped a sack of 200 partial penises onto King Saul’s floor… I’d hate to be the guy who had to count all of those.
*this is by far the most I’ve ever typed the word “penis” on the internet. maybe there’s still more to come. keep reading to find out.*
From what I understood, King David was like this William Wallace, Braveheart character. He kicked butt and took names. To take things further, he straight up killed thousands of people. I thought this is the kind of character that men are supposed to like. He was like a B.C. action hero. Before Mel Gibson and Bruce Willis’ characters, there was King David. King David did other stuff too.
When most people think of the dark side of David they think about the story commonly called David and Bathsheba. To call it the story of David and Bathsheba however, seems to imply that Bathsheba had any sort of say in how it played out, which is unlikely at best.
All over the place, Bathsheba is portrayed as this seductive temptress. In art and in a lot of books written by men, Bathsheba is portrayed as a woman who was seeking to manipulate King David with her looks, but that’s very doubtful. Why was she bathing on her roof? That’s probably where she always bathed. Why was she bathing when she was? It was time for her post-period ritual washing. Since when is having good hygiene seductive!?
Let’s keep in mind, at this point, King David is not a young man seeking a wife. David has more wives than he can handle already! Here’s what we know about Bathsheba: she was married to Uriah (one of King David’s warriors) but had no children. Being married but having no children points to her being around 16 or 17. Knowing all of this changes the story.
Here’s what happened: King David sees a girl (the wife of one of his men) cleaning herself. King David sends the palace guard to go get her. The palace guard shows up at the house of a 17-year-old and brings her to the King. The King has sex with her and sends her home. There are serious power dynamics at play here. Do we really believe that this young woman had much of a choice in the matter? The King gets whatever he wants, all the time. And women were treated as mere property. You do the math, this is not a consensual sexual encounter. This is a bad look for our warrior king, our masculine role model. But wait! It gets worse…
Bathsheba is now pregnant as a result of rape. This should not come as a shock to King David because he saw her ritually purifying herself on the roof, which meant she would have been ovulating. So King David now has to cover his tracks. This is like watching Netflix’s Bloodline or House of Cards, the cover-up always escalates way past the original crime. King David again chooses to use his position of authority for personal gain. He arranges for Uriah to return from battle so that he can lay with his wife in hopes that Uriah will be fooled into believing he is the biological father. King David has a problem though, Uriah is way too loyal to his friends and to King David. How could Uriah possibly make love to his wife while his friends and God’s Ark of the Covenant are out on the battlefield? Uriah sleeps in front of the palace with the servants, but doesn’t go home. So the next night, King David gets Uriah drunk and sends him home to Bathsheba, but once again Uriah refuses to go home and be with his wife resting comfortably. Now King David is forced to try his backup plan. He sends Uriah back to the battlefield and instructs the head officer of his forces to send Uriah to the front and abandon him out there to die. This plan works. Uriah is killed in battle. King David took an already terrible situation and made it much worse.
When Bathsheba, a scared and shamed 17-year-old young woman, heard of her husband’s death, she mourned. King David had her brought to his house and made her his wife. She gave birth to a son.
A prophet named Nathan came to King David and showed him that he was at fault. King David was distraught and worshipped the Lord. It’s here that King David wrote this in Psalm 51:
Create in me a clean heart, oh God. And renew a right spirit within me. Cast me not away from your presence, and don’t take your Holy Spirit away from me.
In this moment, King David does set an example of right living: true conviction and a desire to change. Confession and reorienting his heart toward the heart of God.
But once again, I feel like we, in our hunt for Biblical manhood and Christian masculinity, miss what’s going on here. We have turned this into a story about lust and the desire to not lust. We use this in all of our attempts to keep men from cheating on their wives, and to keep teenage boys from looking at pornography. When we do this, we are narrowing the scope of how the Bible can affect and change our hearts. This story speaks as much to greed and power as it does lust. We hold King David up as a man who in his imperfection and struggle with lust, still was a “man after God’s own heart.” Lust seems to be the socially acceptable struggle for men, almost an accepted masculine sin. Every man’s battle. I bet there’s men out there that have other issues besides lust. And they’re men too.
So maybe David isn’t a great role model for men. I hope men can do better than that. If only we had someone in our Bible who interacted appropriately and lovingly with men and women alike. If only we had someone who we could look to as an example of how men can live.
There’s this guy named Jesus.
Jesus is underrepresented in our “Biblical Manhood” conversations. Sometimes I think we view Jesus as this genderless being who doesn’t have much to say towards specifically men or specifically women. But maybe Jesus does have something to say there. We emphasize Paul’s instructions to husbands and wives, but what about the way that Jesus interacts with people?
Jesus came talking about something new: a new Kingdom. A Kingdom that was different than the kingdom of David. This Kingdom was not a kingdom brought on by a great war or conquering king. This Kingdom was a place where those who were in first place would actually be in last place. This Kingdom was a place where those who were viewed as strong were actually weak, and those who were viewed as weak would actually be put in a place of strength. There would be no warrior king who would force submission to a flag or a throne, but in the Kingdom that Jesus spoke of, there would be a King who submitted himself to death at the hands of the world power in order to give power to the weak and overlooked. Jesus was a different kind of king than ever before, and Jesus was a different kind of man than ever before.
Jesus was normal looking, but the way he acted looked different. Jesus paid special attention, not to the authorities, but instead to the children. Jesus elevated women to a place among his disciples and followers. Jesus flipped the cultural script of how to interact with those on the outside. He wasn’t above extending a healing hand to the sick. Jesus pulled those on the margins into the middle, and many that were in the middle found themselves on the margins.
Jesus brought about a new Kingdom. One that was about love, justice, and peace. Jesus was the first of a new kind of man in this Kingdom. Jesus was a man that was about love, justice, and peace.
If we want to know what it looks like to be a man in the Kingdom of God, why do we start anywhere else besides Jesus? Jesus is the beginning and the end of the conversation.
Can we please stop blending present-day cultural scripts with Bible stories? Culturally boys are being taught from an early age that they have to “be a man,” or “man up.” Using context clues, they understand that this means, “stop crying,” and “suck it up.” I struggle with this because I understand that there are times when sitting ourselves out and crying are not helpful, but can we say it differently than equating masculinity with not being emotionally available? Upon seeing the sadness of Mary and Martha over the loss of his friend Lazarus, Jesus wept. Jesus was emotionally available to the point of tears. From personal experience, I know the social shame of crying in front of other people growing up, especially other boys. Can we do better for the next generation? Can we set a better example for our children? I think we can.
Furthermore, when we break our youth groups up between boys and girls, what do we talk about? Often boys talk about porn and lust, girls talk about body image and virginity. But wait, there’s girls who are dealing with pornography and boys who have a negative body image! When we split up boys and girls to talk about different things, sometimes we are double shaming. Not only does a boy struggling with having a positive body image already deal with shame, now he is dealing with the shame of struggling with something that only girls are supposed to struggle with. He might wonder, “Am I not as masculine as I should be?” Or a girl who finds herself unable to avoid pornography. Not only is that immensely shame inducing already, but now she wonders “Am I less feminine and more masculine because I have this problem?” Sin and the shame it causes does not discriminate based on gender.
To see true, unadulterated Kingdom Manhood, we have to look to Jesus. We can’t apply our modern day masculinity values to it. Men in the Kingdom of God don’t have to be physically strong, emotionally distant, sports-loving, women-objectifying tough guys.
Jesus flips the script on masculinity.
So let’s seek out this Kingdom Manhood. Let’s be men that love other men in a way that is open and accepting. Men that elevate the position of marginalized people groups. And men that are looking to Jesus as a guide.